Hans L Habereder

6796213, Sep 28, 2004

May 23, 2003

10/444938

Thomas L. McKendree - Huntington Beach CA
John D. Britigan - Orange CA
Hans L. Habereder - Orange CA

Raytheon Company - Waltham MA

F41F 500

89 111

A method for providing integrity bounding of a weapon for use in weapon selection and targeting is presented. The method determines an integrity bound for the weapon, the integrity bound defining a zone around the target aim-point within which engagement must occur to meet a predetermined integrity level (i. e. , a probability of engagement within an allowable engagement zone). A method of assigning weapons for engaging a target is also presented. The method includes determining an aim-point of a target and determining an alert limit for the aim-point, the alert limit comprising a zone that includes the aim-point and excludes any friendly sites. Weapon selection is then performed by selecting a weapon having an integrity bound less than or equal to the alert limit.

6896220, May 24, 2005

May 23, 2003

10/444937

Thomas L. McKendree - Huntington Beach CA, US
John D. Britigan - Orange CA, US
Hans L. Habereder - Orange CA, US

Raytheon Company - Waltham MA

F41F005/00

244 315, 244 317, 89 111

A munition is presented which includes an integrity verification system that measures the integrity of the munition. When an integrity threshold is not met, engagement of the munition with a predetermined target is aborted. Also presented is a methodology for gating the engagement of the munition with the target. The methodology includes performing an integrity check of the munition after it is deployed. The method further includes aborting the engagement of the target when the integrity check of the munition fails.

6952001, Oct 4, 2005

May 23, 2003

10/444936

Thomas L. McKendree - Huntington Beach CA, US
Hans L. Habereder - Orange CA, US
Donald R. Ormand - Coto De Caza CA, US

Raytheon Company - Waltham MA

G01S013/88
G01S015/88
G01S017/88

244 31, 342 52, 342 53, 342 54, 342 55, 342 61, 342 62, 342 63, 367 87, 356 401, 382100, 89 111

A system and method of providing situational awareness and weapon targeting is presented. The method includes determining the location of one or more enemy sites and one or more friendly sites. A “Do Not Engage” (DNE) zone is determined around each of the friendly sites and an “Allowable Engagement” (AE) zone is established around each of the enemy sites, wherein none of the AE zones overlap any of the DNE zones. An engagement plan is then determined based on the AE zones and integrity bounds on candidate munitions. The system includes a processing and communications network and a sensor element in communication with the processing and communications network. The system also includes a command control element in communication with the processing and communications network and an operating elements section in communication with the processing and communications network.

7207517, Apr 24, 2007

Feb 11, 2005

11/056977

Thomas L. McKendree - Huntington Beach CA, US
John D. Britigan - Orange CA, US
Hans L. Habereder - Orange CA, US

Raytheon Company - Waltham MA

F42B 15/01

244 315

A munition is presented which includes an integrity verification system that measures the integrity of the munition. When an integrity threshold is not met, engagement of the munition with a predetermined target is aborted. Also presented is a methodology for gating the engagement of the munition with the target. The methodology includes performing an integrity check of the munition after it is deployed. The method further includes aborting the engagement of the target when the integrity check of the munition fails.

7367525, May 6, 2008

Feb 11, 2005

11/056065

Thomas L. McKendree - Huntington Beach CA, US
John D. Britigan - Orange CA, US
Hans L. Habereder - Orange CA, US

Raytheon Company - Waltham MA

F41G 7/00
F42B 15/01
F42B 15/00

244 315, 244 31, 89 111

A munition is presented which includes an integrity verification system that measures the integrity of the munition. When an integrity threshold is not met, engagement of the munition with a predetermined target is aborted. Also presented is a methodology for gating the engagement of the munition with the target. The methodology includes performing an integrity check of the munition after it is deployed. The method further includes aborting the engagement of the target when the integrity check of the munition fails.

20050188826, Sep 1, 2005

Aug 6, 2004

10/912963

Thomas McKendree - Huntington Beach CA, US
John Britigan - Orange CA, US
Hans Habereder - Orange CA, US

B64D001/04

089001110

A method for providing integrity bounding of a weapon for use in weapon selection and targeting is presented. The method determines an integrity bound for the weapon, the integrity bound defining a zone around the target aim-point within which engagement must occur to meet a predetermined integrity level (i.e., a probability of engagement within an allowable engagement zone). A method of assigning weapons for engaging a target is also presented. The method includes determining an aim-point of a target and determining an alert limit for the aim-point, the alert limit comprising a zone that includes the aim-point and excludes any friendly sites. Weapon selection is then performed by selecting a weapon having an integrity bound less than or equal to the alert limit.

20080127814, Jun 5, 2008

Jan 21, 2008

12/017177

Thomas L. McKendree - Huntington Beach CA, US
John D. Britigan - Orange CA, US
Hans L. Habereder - Orange CA, US

B64D 1/04

89 111

A method for providing integrity bounding of a weapon for use in weapon selection and targeting is presented. The method determines an integrity bound for the weapon, the integrity bound defining a zone around the target aim-point within which engagement must occur to meet a predetermined integrity level (i.e., a probability of engagement within an allowable engagement zone). A method of assigning weapons for engaging a target is also presented. The method includes determining an aim-point of a target and determining an alert limit for the aim-point, the alert limit comprising a zone that includes the aim-point and excludes any friendly sites. Weapon selection is then performed by selecting a weapon having an integrity bound less than or equal to the alert limit.

53576322, Oct 18, 1994

Aug 8, 1991

7/742781

Chao-Kuang Pian - Anaheim CA
Hans L. Habereder - Orange CA

Hughes Aircraft Company - Los Angeles CA

G06F 946
G06F 9445

395650

A plurality of control processors distribute data to be processed to a corresponding plurality of arithmetic processors using a dynamic allocation arrangement. The arithmetic processors process blocks of information and communicate the blocks of processed information to the control processors for subsequent processing as necessary. The control processors are implemented to efficiently allocate tasks to the arithmetic processors and to partition blocks of data for allocation as separate partitioned tasks to the arithmetic processors. This partitioning of blocks of data to be processed as partitioned tasks significantly reduces the delay until the results are available by distributing the task over a plurality of arithmetic processors. It also significantly improves utilization of processing resources by assigning the task to a plurality of processors that may be available.