Christopher Michael Bonewitz

8144598, Mar 27, 2012

Sep 4, 2009

12/554804

Brett P. Hollman - Louisville CO, US
Jeffrey L. Martin - Frederick CO, US
George T. Joseph - Denver CO, US
Alex J. Henes - Denver CO, US
Christopher M. Bonewitz - Golden CO, US
Kaveh Asalian - Broomfield CO, US
Geoff R. Yaworski - Denver CO, US
Gary L. Ryczek - Denver CO, US
Colin G. Train - Aurora CO, US

Level 3 Communications, LLC - Broomfield CO

H04L 12/26

370238, 370232, 370237, 370400, 709238

A system for automated installation of a communication line using an optimal route between a source location and a destination location is disclosed. The system includes a routing engine providing an automated design process for rendering the optimal route. The routing engine utilizes a routing algorithm to select the optimal route from a graph of capacity links defining a plurality of possible routes between the source and destination locations. If, at any time during the design process, the optimal route or capacity links defining the optimal route are detected as unavailable for any reason, the routing engine re-initiates the design process and thereafter selects a new optimal route based upon a new capacity graph built without the previously unavailable capacity link. Once designed, the available optimal route is provided to a command and control engine, which, in turn, manages the installation of the communication line using the optimal route. The command and control engine manages the process for assigning the optimal route in the provisioning system.

8149714, Apr 3, 2012

Dec 4, 2006

11/566649

Brett P. Hollman - Louisville CO, US
Jeffrey L. Martin - Frederick CO, US
George T. Joseph - Denver CO, US
Alex J. Henes - Denver CO, US
Christopher M. Bonewitz - Golden CO, US
Kaveh Asalian - Broomfield CO, US
Geoff R. Yaworski - Denver CO, US
Gary L. Ryczek - Denver CO, US
Colin G. Train - Aurora CO, US

Level 3 Communications, LLC - Broomfield CO

H04L 12/26

370238, 709238, 709239, 709240, 709241, 709242, 709243, 709244

A system for automated installation of a communication line using an optimal route between a source location and a destination location is disclosed. The system includes a routing module configured to provide an automated design process for rendering the optimal route. The routing module utilizes a routing algorithm to select the optimal route from a graph of capacity links defining a plurality of possible routes between the source and destination locations. If, at any time during the design process, the optimal route or capacity links defining the optimal route are detected as unavailable for any reason, the routing module re-initiates the design process and thereafter selects a new optimal route based upon a new capacity graph built without the previously unavailable capacity link. A command and control engine manages the process for assigning the optimal route in the provisioning system.

8155009, Apr 10, 2012

Sep 4, 2009

12/554835

Brett P. Hollman - Louisville CO, US
Jeffrey L. Martin - Frederick CO, US
George T. Joseph - Denver CO, US
Alex J. Henes - Denver CO, US
Christopher M. Bonewitz - Golden CO, US
Kaveh Asalian - Broomfield CO, US
Geoff R. Yaworski - Denver CO, US
Gary L. Ryczek - Denver CO, US
Colin G. Train - Aurora CO, US

Level 3 Communications, LLC - Broomfield CO

H04L 12/26

370238, 370232, 370237, 370400, 709238

A system for automated installation of a communication line using an optimal route between a source location and a destination location is disclosed. The system includes a routing engine providing an automated design process for rendering the optimal route. The routing engine utilizes a routing algorithm to select the optimal route from a graph of capacity links defining a plurality of possible routes between the source and destination locations. If, at any time during the design process, the optimal route or capacity links defining the optimal route are detected as unavailable for any reason, the routing engine re-initiates the design process and thereafter selects a new optimal route based upon a new capacity graph built without the previously unavailable capacity link. Once designed, the available optimal route is provided to a command and control engine, which, in turn, manages the installation of the communication line using the optimal route. The command and control engine manages the process for assigning the optimal route in the provisioning system.

8238252, Aug 7, 2012

Sep 4, 2009

12/554823

Brett P. Hollman - Louisville CO, US
Jeffrey L. Martin - Frederick CO, US
George T. Joseph - Denver CO, US
Alex J. Henes - Denver CO, US
Christopher M. Bonewitz - Golden CO, US
Kaveh Asalian - Broomfield CO, US
Geoff R. Yaworski - Denver CO, US
Gary L. Ryczek - Denver CO, US
Colin G. Train - Aurora CO, US

Level 3 Communications, LLC - Broomfield CO

H04L 12/26

370238, 370232, 370237, 370400, 709238

A system for automated installation of a communication line using an optimal route between a source location and a destination location is disclosed. The system includes a routing engine providing an automated design process for rendering the optimal route. The routing engine utilizes a routing algorithm to select the optimal route from a graph of capacity links defining a plurality of possible routes between the source and destination locations. If, at any time during the design process, the optimal route or capacity links defining the optimal route are detected as unavailable for any reason, the routing engine re-initiates the design process and thereafter selects a new optimal route based upon a new capacity graph built without the previously unavailable capacity link. Once designed, the available optimal route is provided to a command and control engine, which, in turn, manages the installation of the communication line using the optimal route. The command and control engine manages the process for assigning the optimal route in the provisioning system.

20030142808, Jul 31, 2003

Jan 25, 2002

10/057362

Brett Hollman - Louisville CO, US
Jeffrey Martin - Frederick CO, US
George Joseph - Denver CO, US
Alex Henes - Denver CO, US
Christopher Bonewitz - Golden CO, US
Kaveh Asalian - Broomfield CO, US
Geoff Yaworski - Denver CO, US
Gary Ryczek - Denver CO, US
Colin Train - Aurora CO, US

Level (3) Communications

H04M007/00
H04M003/08
H04M003/22

379/221010, 379/027070, 379/114020, 379/201120

A system for automated installation of a communication line using an optimal route between a source location and a destination location is disclosed. The system includes a routing engine providing an automated design process for rendering the optimal route. The routing engine utilizes a routing algorithm to select the optimal route from a graph of capacity links defining a plurality of possible routes between the source and destination locations. If, at any time during the design process, the optimal route or capacity links defining the optimal route are detected as unavailable for any reason, the routing engine re-initiates the design process and thereafter selects a new optimal route based upon a new capacity graph built without the previously unavailable capacity link. Once designed, the available optimal route is provided to a command and control engine, which, in turn, manages the installation of the communication line using the optimal route. The command and control engine manages the process for assigning the optimal route in the provisioning system.